II. FAMILY IN THE CAODAI
NEW LAW (continued)
3. Protecting
and educating the disciples’ future generations
Ah! What
would the world be to us if the children were no more?
HENRY WADSWORTH
LONGFELLOW
(American poet, 1807-1882)
From East to West, past and present, all sages, worthies, and
superior men always value, love and take care of the future generations of
families, nations, and mankind. For instance:
According to Analects (5:26),
when his disciple asked Confucius to tell his wishes, the Master said, “I would like (…) the young to be given
nurturance.”
On 11 December 1946, the United Nations took the initiative in
establishing the United Nations
Children’s Fund, an international organisation which works for children’s
rights, survival, development and protection. In 1953, its name was changed to
the United Nations International
Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF).
Herbert Hoover, American President, was quite right by saying, “Children are our most valuable natural resource.”
Guan Zhong (725-645 BC), a very eminent politician once said,
“The best one-year plan is nothing else
than growing crops. The best ten-year plan is nothing else than growing trees.
The best whole life plan is nothing else than rearing people. Growing one then
harvesting one, it refers to crops. Growing one then harvesting ten, it refers
to trees. Growing one then harvesting a hundred, it refers to people.” [1]
The New Law of course pays very much attention to protecting and rearing
children − the future generations of families, Caodaism, society, and the
nation.
Taking precautions against a small, parentless child becoming forlorn,
the New Law provides that there shall be a person responsible for sponsoring
the child in substitution for his or her parents.
This sponsorship shall not be delayed until the child’s orphanage;
contrarily, every parish should attend to the matter as soon as there is a
newborn.
Article Eleven in Secular Law stipulates, “A newborn should have godparents chosen so that it can be nurtured in
case of orphanage.”
Caodaism is an endogenous religion founded in South Vietnam in 1926 and
developing in decades of unceasing war, when bombs and bullets as well as
poverty were major factors pushing a great deal of children to orphanage. Thus,
parallel with Article Eleven mentioned above, Caodaism did take care of orphans
with concrete activities.
In 1927, with very scanty money when starting the Holy See construction
in the wilds of Tây Ninh province, the earliest Caodai Church
also established a few simple institutions for orphans.
Le Caodaïsme en Images (Caodaism in Images) by Gabriel Gobron provides some photos of
orphanages, children’s refectory, gifts of sweets and cookies shared out to
orphans… at the Tây Ninh Holy See.
Pics 1-2. Orphanage at the Tây Ninh Holy See.
Pic 3. Children’s refectory at the Holy See.
Pics 4-5. Gifts of sweets and
cookies shared out to ophans.
The New Law also pays attention to the education of disciples’ children.
Education is a sacred mission to which everybody is obliged to contribute.
Victor Hugo (French author, 1802-1885) said, “He who opens a school door closes a prison.” [2]
In Caodai communities, for the sake of future generations, the New Law
requires compulsory education. Article Thirteen in Secular Law stipulates, “Parents are required to send their children
aged from six to twelve years to school for general and religious education.”
In order to have enough facilities to support compulsory education,
Article Twenty-Three, Chapter VI, Religious Law, stipulates, “Schools will be established in Caodai
communities to provide religious and general education.”
Inaugurated in November 1926, the new religion was just at its beginning.
However, to carry out the New Law, in September 1928 the Caodai Tây Ninh Church
established an elementary institution named the Đạo Đức (Virtue) School. The
first school year’s enrolment included two hundred and ten pupils. On Sunday 18
August 1929, attending the awards ceremony, His Excellency Cardinal Lê Văn
Trung (1876-1934) praised both teachers and pupils for having overcome all
kinds of deficiencies to successfully complete their first school year. Then,
reminding everyone of the situation full of hardships, he said, “Our religion is poor, short of money. Our
teachers are paid no salaries, but have diligently instructed children day
after day, sacrificing themselves for the little beings. Our small pupils, boys
and girls, have to write on dried leaves. Rough boards are used rather than
beds. Meager meals consist of only vegetables and salted water.”
In 1931, the Đạo Đức
School had eight classes,
consisting of six ones for boys, one for girls, and one for Khmer children
whose parents were voluntarily offering free labour contribution to build the
Holy See for long periods of time. The whole enrolment was two hundred and
seventy-four children. All teachers qualified with diplomas willingly worked
without salaries, and their pupils did not have to pay tuition fees.
In 1932 the Đạo Đức
School opened three more
classes for boys, two of which were for infants. Totally, the school had eleven
classes. The whole enrolment was four hundred and seventeen (including three
hundred and twelve boys, a hundred and five girls); so, it was a hundred and
forty-three higher than the previous year. That year, all of twenty-six
examinees were successful, and twenty-one of them had followed a French
curriculum.
During the years 1933-1940, the Đạo Đức School ’s
annual enrolment and number of classes increased, all at elementary level.
Le Caodaïsme en Images (Caodaism in Images) by Gabriel
Gobron provides two elementary classes circa in the 1930s, held at the Tây Ninh
Holy See.
Elementary classes in the
1930s, at the Holy See. Below: Mr. Võ Tấn Lộc, teaching at the Lê Văn
Trung Elementary and Secondary School during 1970-1975.
In 1941, the French army occupied the Tây Ninh Holy See and closed the
Đạo Đức School .
Around September 1946, the Tây Ninh Church
reestablished the Đạo Đức
School in a new piece of
land because the old educational premises were badly ruined. Classrooms made of
mud walls and thatched roofs were hastily erected to be ready for the school
year 1946-1947.
In 1952, the Đạo Đức
School had sixty
classrooms made of thatched roofs and unbaked brick walls. Besides, it had a
row of tile roofed classrooms for grades one and two. There were ten classes
for fifth graders, who were at the final level of elementary education.
In the same year (1952), to admit newly successful elementary graduates,
the Holy See opened twelve grade 6 classes, two of which were for pupils from
outside Tây Ninh province. In school year 1952-1953, grade 6 classes were
merged with another local school, where His Excellency Phạm Công Tắc
(1890-1959) chaired its new school year opening ceremony in September 1952. On
this occasion, he named it Lê Văn Trung
Free School, which later was renamed Lê
Văn Trung Elementary and Secondary School.
The Đạo Đức
School continued to
pursue its elementary teaching. After graduation, disciples’ children would
join the Lê Văn Trung School mentioned above. Until the first half of 1970s
that school was still in operation. An ex-teacher of the school still kept a
photograph showing part of its slogan: Solidarity
- Amity…
[See
plate 7, page 8H.]
Besides the Đạo Đức School situated in the area of the Tây Ninh Holy See,
the Caodai Church opened provincial schools called Minh Đức Tân Dân (Renovated People of
Illustrious Virtue) Schools or Đại Đồng (Great Harmony) Schools. Their teachers were appointed
by the Holy See.[3]
The above description of the educational activities carried out by the
Tây Ninh Holy See shows that the New Law was seriously and earnestly
implemented in the context of Caodaism, a newly-founded religion facing a
variety of inevitable difficulties.
Returning to Article Twenty-Three as quoted above, the New Law correctly
puts much importance on educating disciples’ children. It regards the heavy
responsibility of educating children as an obligation binding on every person,
involving the participation of disciples’ families and the Caodai Church .
Francis Keppel (American educator, 1916-1990)
said,“Education is too important
to be left solely to the educators.” His words
imply that besides national educational institutions, both social and religious
organisations should have legitimate rights to directly participate in the
cause of children’s education.
In any disoriented society (due to focussing too much on
material values), religions should be allowed to open their own schools so that
they can, parallel with general education, add part of their basic ethics in
order to train children virtuously and thus, they can bring long-lasting,
sustainable values to society.
III. CONCLUSION
In summary, with legitimate and humane measures to protect disciples’
families in normal and unexpected cases, protect and educate future generations
of disciples’ families, the Caodai New Law entirely shows its good will as well
as efforts to help disciples successfully build and consolidate their own
healthy, happy families.
For humans, there is nothing closer and more intimate than their
families. Stipulations on family prescribed in the New Law are evidence of
humanistic value of the Caodai New Law.
Nhiêu Lộc, 01 September 2014
HUỆ KHẢI